Even Maxim can't step to:
Maddox: The Revolutionary
Update: 05/24/2003 - Maxim did not steal my article. The similarities were a coincidence.
I've been getting a lot of email from people who have noticed that Maxim
magazine has published an article similar to my muppet article that I
posted back in September of this year. For those of you not familiar with
Maxim, it's a soft-core porn magazine for men. Every issue is the
same: some chick on the cover wearing a bra made out of her hands, an
eight page spread on the same chick inside with an interview in which she
tries to come across as "sexy with a brain," tons of ads, the latest
discoveries in sexual positions from a crack team of scientists (complete
with illustrations because apparently there's still something new to
be discovered about sex), a sex quiz that will dictate your sexual IQ (because
it matters), and the rest is mostly comprised of boner jokes and trivia. It
was in a news parody that Maxim published a piece similar to mine regarding
the muppet with AIDS.
The article in question is on
page 68 of the December 2002 issue of Maxim. While there are a few
similarities, I'll give Maxim the benefit of the doubt (despite
finding hits from Maxim in my server logs). After all, it was a pretty
obvious parody. So obvious that some random asshole with a personal home
page like say, I don't know, me, thought up of the idea the day the new
muppet with AIDS was announced (in fact, several weeks before a press photo
was even available).
Which is why it took a huge publication like Maxim and their highly
paid writers with fancy degrees over three months to come up with the same
idea. I can't believe how much I rule. Seriously, I'm not even paid to
come up with this stuff and I'm kicking Maxim's ass. Why don't they just
hire me instead?
Wow, that's clever. The caption underneath the picture reads "teaches
kids: tie her up and Grandma's Hummels can be traded straight up for
delicious drugs!" zzzzZZZZzzz.
Moving on, the other characters they have
are "Bookie Monster, Dorko Techsupportus III,"
and "Jean-Paul the Frog." The Jean-Paul caption
reads "teaches kids: french children are just like
American kids...except for the smell, the snottiness, and the
mustaches!"
Maybe they were planning on introducing the punch line in a later issue.
Some of their puppets look better, but I don't have the benefit of having
an art staff or photographers. In fact, I do most of my graphics in Paint
for Windows, and it still rules all over the place. The problem with this
article is that it just sits there. It doesn't make me want to do anything
except turn the page (and since it's in a Maxim, you can be guaranteed you'll
be turning the page to an ad).
All joking aside, I'd rather read my site than anything else at any given
time, even though I wrote it. I don't think I'm exaggerating when I say that
my site is the only thing worth reading on the internet. The internet had no
purpose until my site came along and gave it some worth. I'm going to
go out and buy myself a couple of birthday cakes, then I'm going to
commission someone to sculpt a statue of me made out of beef jerky and
shrimp kurma with pulao rice. Man I rule.
There are some obvious similarities between my article and
theirs, but they differ on a fundamental
level: their article sucks. The premise is essentially the
same: "foreign versions of Sesame Street give kids the gritty
truth. So why can't we?" Then it goes on to list some character parodies.
The first one is called "Cracky," with a quote
that says "my pimp says four teeth be sexy."
250,719 people paid Maxim $4 for an inferior article.